Saturday

Giotto and the Arena Chapel, a video and transcript for my students





In this next section I want to talk about to really important figures, the artist Giotto and the author Dante. These two historical figures have a direct impact on the creation of the decoration of the Chapel in Padua called the Arena Chapel. In order to understand these two historic figures’ works have to look at the social and economic world of the Renaissance.


Giotto is a Proto Renaissance painter. This means that Giotto is working in a transitional period between the Gothic and the Renaissance periods. His work exhibits qualities of the late Gothic and also some innovative new things that were happening during the Renaissance. The main patron for this family was the Scrovegni family.

EnricoScrovegni was the grandson of amending Reginaldo. He hired Giotto to paint the interior of this Chapel as an indulgence meeting that what he was hoping was the church and God would forgive his grandfather Reginaldo for being what was called the userer. This is a common practice during the Renaissance what would happen is a person would go to the church and ask the church if there was something that they could do in order to indulge the church and get forgiveness for sins. One way in which the church so-called forgave sins was to was to ask a patron, the patron is a person who pays for work of art, to decorate a church by hiring a top artist. What this person was hoping was that by indulging the church they could buy their ancestor out of years of purgatory or hell.




It’s kind of a contradiction in terms to see Reginaldo Scrovegni depicted on the walls of the arena Chapel in Padua but it also relates to the author Dante whose handwriting is all over the arena Chapel in a reference to his epic poem the Divine Comedy.

Dante was a famous Florentine who was exiled from Florence for siding with a wrong or less powerful political party during the 13 century. While in exile and living in Padua Italy he began his work on an epic poem that was written in vernacular Italian. The poem that within imaginary epic journey that Dante took during the middle of his years into the several rounds of hell heaven and purgatory. It starts with the journey down into the underworld in which he’s ushered down by a a series of large monstrous animals. When he gets to the first level of purgatory he is met by the classical poet Virgil. The reason why Virgil meets him and is not in heaven is because Virgil never knew Christian teachings but somehow you still worthy of traveling between the realms.


Dante’s version of the afterworld is based more or less on a series of gases and miss apprehensions about what the Bible says and it is also combined with the classical view of the world. Probably one of the most important things about it is that sort of popular culture view of the afterlife that’s also based on classical teachings doesn’t really exist in the Bible. The fact that it’s written in Italian also made it much more accessible to the population at that point in time and serve to elevate Dante as one of the first and foremost writers of the Renaissance.

The fact that it was written in Italian meant that artists and intellectuals were able to read his version and they sort of combined it with images from medieval last judgment and developed a further iconography during the Renaissance of the betrayal of the afterlife which Giotto the artist picked up on. He people this afterworld with a series of characters and people that he knew from Florence. In some cases it was an indictment of some of his enemies but it was also an indictment of some of his friends because he put both his friends and enemies both in hell and in heaven.

In his first meeting in purgatory Dante meets to characters from Florence and Paolo and Francesca. The theme of Paolo and Francesca is a theme that shared in many works of art and you also see it in the Gates of hell by the sculptor Rodin. The story goes something like this when Dante sees Paolo and Francesca floating in the sky of purgatory he calls to them and asks them what’s wrong. Francesca floats down to him and explains to him that she committed the sin, but you get the feeling from her description that she doesn’t really believe it’s a sin. Person wasn’t sitting around one afternoon reading Boccaccio’s book the Decameron . She’s described as reading this cam run for pleasure with her brother-in-law. She literally says something like she was reading it for pleasure and you get the feeling that she was actually reading it for the dirty parts. This inflamed Francesca and Paolo and just before they were about to kiss her husband came in and murdered both his brother and her. The result they ended up in purgatory.


Purgatory for Francesca and Paolo means that they are floating around in the sky out-of-control but they cannot touch each other nor can they really see each other. They basically float around in the sky with their backs to each other three or 4 feet away from each other almost within arms length. If they try to get away from each other they are forced to stay that single 4 feet away from each other but if they try to touch each other they also cannot touch each other. In essence they got what they desired their out of control and in this state of not being able to get to one another. One gets the feeling that if they admitted their sin they might graduate out of purgatory and maybe make it to heaven and that’s the whole point. Dante’s kind of giving you a view of what sin really is.

In addition to putting Francesca and Paolo and hell Dante also places various clergy members in hell with their heads and holes also in purgatory. He’s kind of giving you examples that even the clergy can go to heaven and even the clergy can go to hell that everyone is not always on the right path. The ideas that Dante’s kind of giving you a feeling of what his life is like at this sort of existential turn point in the middle of his life. In essence what he’s trying to do is find the right path and show you through literature how to attain the kingdom of heaven.

Another set of characters that Dante puts in purgatory or hell are the actual Scrovegni family. It’s interesting because Giotto also includes Reginaldo Scrovegni in his fresco the Last Judgment. In EnricoScrovegni is standing just left of the crucifix holding up an image of the Arena Chapel itself. In fact this somehow relates to the fact that Dante puts Reginaldo Scrovegni in the seventh circle of hell which is a place where the evil and violent go to. So in essence what EnricoScrovegni and John torture to do is renovate Reginaldo’s reputation that was established I Dante in the Divine Comedy.







This somewhat relates to one of the smaller frescoes in the Chapel which is an allegorical figure of avarice and charity. These images of virtues and vices contain emblems and icons that are very similar to some of the ones that are in Dante’s script here’s a passage,

Despondency was bursting from their eyes this side them that their hands kept fending off, at times the flames, at times the burning soil not otherwise do dogs in summer now with muzzle now with paw when they are bitten by fleas or gnats or by sharp gadfly. When I set my eyes upon the faces of some who the painful fire falls, I recognized no one but I did notice that from the neck of each purse was hung that had a special color or an emblem and their eyes seemed to feast upon these pouches.

What he’s describing is actually the purses and the color of the purses which is emblematic of the Scrovegni family.




If you look at the Arena Chapel, you’ll see that it’s arranged almost like a comic strip but the comic strip has more meaning than that. It’s arranged in a way that you can actually understand that there’s a hierarchy in place as well. It’s meant to describe the actions of the ideal person who was Jesus but it’s also meant to describe the actions of on ideal people and how and where they are in the world.



For example there’s a series of frescoes that are painted in Brown’s this is also referred to as monochromatic or in “grisailles” French for in gray. These monochromatic frescoes are also painted as if they look like marble. They look like a series of marble sculptures and each one represents the virtues and vices if you look closely at them you’ll see that they almost stand as columns or supporters for the frescoes that are above them. The frescoes that sit atop the virtues and vices represent the life and times of Jesus Christ. These monochromatic paintings are sort of faux finish they are in essence trompe “l’oeil” which means in French to fool the eye. In some ways illusionistic painting like this is a way of getting out of using real materials like marble but it also shows the artists virtuosity in depicting textures and light. In essence this kind of painting shows the artists abilities.

Let’s start with the Last Judgment. The theme of the Last Judgment, is one that has been used for thousands of years in Christian art. There’s even one that’s kind of a last judgment in Egyptian art and even has scales and it like some of the ones that we’ve been looking. The basic design of it is structured in such a way that it symmetrical. First one needs to look at the organization of the fresco in order to understand how these things work.



Like it’s Romanesque predecessor Giotto’s Last Judgment is designed to be symmetrical you can divided town the center it also has three layers to it at the bottom are the elect or people being pulled out of their graves for the last judgment that is on the right-hand side of Jesus but also on our left-hand side. We can also see this in the Romanesque version however the people being lifted out of their graves are all on the bottom level of the Romanesque sculpture. We see in the center of each work of art the figure of Jesus larger than all of the other figures this is called hieratic scale. Everyone on the right-hand side of Jesus seems to be being saved or entering the Kingdom of Heaven. Everyone on the left-hand side of Jesus is in a bit of trouble and if you look at the bottom level to the left of Jesus you’ll see that that represents hell. The top layer represents heaven with the disciples and the apostles surrounding Jesus advising him and also trying to intercede on our behalf. This means that their actually talking to Jesus on our behalf and asking him to let us into heaven that’s why Catholics often pray to Saints because the same might have more influence with Jesus than our own prayers.











The overall structure of scenes of Last Judgment all adhere to this basic schema. In Giotto’s version however he adds some extra things that are probably based on Dante. For example, in hell there’s a River fire and the devil is represented much how Dante describes him in the Divine Comedy. One of the things that seems to be influenced most by Dante but it also exists in earlier frescoes is that there’s a figure who looks like he might be clergy member in hell seemingly blessing a figure whose offering him a bag of money. This in some ways could also represent Reginaldo Scrovegni and could be a sarcastic statement that indulgence is not working and that the fresco will not really get him out of hell.




Focusing in on Satan he is riding on the backs of dragons he’s eating people and then excreting them out and that is they are hell this is what they suffer from. This very much matches some of Dante’s descriptions as well. There’s even a River of fire. It also recalls classical descriptions of Hades or the afterworld. We’ll see similar kinds of images in the work of Michelangelo.



Looking at the cycle of frescoes as a whole series of stories you can dissected in a sort of narrative cycle or a structural analysis. In some ways it’s very similar to how we read comic books. In this case some foundational kinds of images are placed at the very bottoms in this case the virtues and vices, but we also see wedge between the virtues and vices and at the top level the life and times of Mary and her parents are the life and times of Jesus. It’s almost like the story or bands the two bands that describe the life and times of Jesus are the cream inside and Oreo cookie the most important ideas. The virtues and the vices are the foundation on which Jesus is ideas are built and the Catholic faith, Jesus is in the center of everything, including the Last Judgment, and Jesus his parents and family are above him and it seems as if there wisdom is sort of trickling down to him as a on the entire story. Study the diagram and notice how things are arranged in such a way that the story concerning Jesus is at eyelevel and the most visible thing and Jesus is the most visible figure In the Last Judgment. He is the largest figure in the faith.



We also need to take a look the frescoes in terms of their formal qualities. This means how they physically look and how illusionistic they are. We’ve already discussed the trompe l’oeil aspects of the virtues and vices they look a little bit like sculpture from for instance the Panathenaic procession from ancient Greece. But their other things that make the frescoes very illusionistic.

Especially in the Last Judgment we get a sense of foreshortening, which is a way of shortening the figures as the project out of the picture plane and also we get more realistic anatomy. Giotto is also giving you a sense of light and shadow which is referred to as chiaroscuro in his painting. Even with some of the more architectural things like the chairs that the apostles are sitting on seem to almost have a sense of perspective although in this case it’s intuitive perspective not linear perspective. In essence job to is doing something different than his teacher Cimabue. He’s using accurate anatomy he’s using a little bit of intuitive perspective and he’s also using shading also refer to as chiaroscuro which defines even the drapery on the bodies.
 

Focusing in on one of the frescoes that depicts Jesus entering the city of Jerusalem you’ll see that the iconography is pretty standard and also resembles very much this Bible passage.
Matthew chapter 21. 
When they drew near Jerusalem and came to Bethphage on the mount of olives, Jesus sent two disciples, saying to them, go into the village opposite you, and immediately you will find an ass tethered, and a colt with her.  Untie them and bring them here to me.  And if anyone should say anything to you, reply the master has need of them that he will send them at once.  This happened so that you been spoken through the prophet might be fulfilled say to say to daughter Zion, behold, your King comes to you, meek and riding on an ass, and on a colt, the foal a beast of burden the disciples went and did as Jesus had ordered them.  They brought the ass and the colt and laid their cloaks over them, and he sat upon them the very large crowd spread their cloaks on the road, while others cut branches from the trees and strewed them on the road.  The crowds preceded him and those following kept crying out and saying was added to the son of David blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord Hosanna in the highest and when he entered Jerusalem the whole city was shaken and asked who is this and the crowds replied.  This is Jesus the prophet, from Nazareth in Galilee. 



The Bible passage as well as some stained-glass windows and other depictions that we’ve looked at, all seem very much in line with the iconography we see here. The boys are up in the trees cutting Palm leaves and string them on the ground. There are people taking off their cloaks. Throwing them all on the ground to protect or to honor the pathway of Jesus but Giotto does something a little bit different. First of all there’s the formal stuff such as shading and more realistic anatomy but he also seems to give a sense of humanity to the figures. In the lower right-hand corner there’s one figure they can’t seem to get his cloak off fast enough. The donkey which is clearly described in the passage is smiling. Both of these things are kind of jokes. The same way putting the clergy and hell is.



The architecture almost seems to be three-dimensional again it’s an intuitive perspective. Probably the most important thing though is a sense of humanistic gesture and how all of the figures relate to one another. The figures behind Jesus are overlapping and you can’t see each one of them this is almost how it really looks. Each of the figures is actually looking at Jesus and responding to him in a way that you and I might relate to the even have facial expressions.

Another panel that’s really important is the panel showing the Lamentation or the Entombment of Jesus.




This is a very common theme in religious art entombment or lamentation kind of scene in which there figure surrounding the already dead Jesus and honoring him. In this instance Giotto does things that are a little bit different than some of the other painters though and it will be taken up by later Renaissance artist some of the things that he does.

In the sky floating above the dead Christ are series of Angels who all have facial expressions and seem to be expressing emotion. Their bodies are foreshortened they seem to be really swooping down and flying up and he really understands the volumes of their torsos.

The next level you can see the role of figures who are surrounding Jesus each have individual facial expressions their anatomy is accurate. One figure in attempt to show foreshortening even has his arms outstretched as he stands above Jesus in a pose that only seems to say “I can’t believe he’s dead.” Jesus is anatomy is almost heroic in a classical way he’s very well-muscled. In the foreground Giotto does something slightly different also. He puts to the figures with their backs to the viewer it’s almost like a detective movie from today. The backs of those figure seem to block your view and you want to look around them to be able to see him and to experience what they’re experiencing. It’s a way of pulling you into the painting.

Probably one of the most innovative things that Giotto does in this painting is also to refer to the story of Mary Magdalene washing Jesus’s feet and drying his feet with her hair but it wasn’t in this episode that were looking at. If you recall that happens earlier in the life and times of Jesus. In essence what Giotto is doing is identifying her figure and separating her from the others by showing you that he understands some of the things that happen in the Bible.




Dog Pulchritude

Friday

She was beautiful half nude In the Silverlight, watercolor on heavy paper 9 x 12" by Kenney Mencher


California Arts Council:

August 22, 2013 artbeat 
California Arts Council
New in-depth interview with Arts Council Director
"While the Council has seen tremendous cuts in the past ... there is a building momentum for bringing back the strength the Arts Council once enjoyed."
California Arts Council Director Craig Watson recently sat down for a half-hour interview with the KHSU Public Radio program, Artwaves. Listen to Craig discuss new funding, arts education, our strategic plan progress, and the future of the California Arts Council.
California jazz orgs receive major NEA funding
The National Endowment for the Arts announced Wednesday that California's Monterey Jazz Festival and SF JAZZ are among the six recipients of the 2013-2014 NEA Jazz Masters Live grants. This week also marked the passing of two legendary NEA Jazz Masters, Cedar Walton and Marian McPartland.

what's new jobs
Director, Government & Foundations
San Diego Opera
San Diego, CA
Mentor
Southern Exposure
San Francisco, CA
Art Instructor
Pinot's Palette
Valencia, CA
Executive Director
The Museums of Los Gatos
Los Gatos, CA
grants artist calls
The Cultural Exchange Fund
The Association of Performing Arts Presenters
Deadline: 2013-08-14
California Documentary Project Grant
Cal Humanities
Deadline: 2013-10-01
"Hypocrisy" Juried Show - No Submission Fee
Arterie Fine Arts
Naperville, IL
Altadena Community Art Market
Altadena Community Arts Center
Altadena
Composite Arts Magazine Call for Visual Artists
Composite Arts Magazine
Online
Call for Visual Artists to Illustrate Children's Book
The Master-Player Library
Flagstaff, AZ
Video Art Screening
Trestle Gallery
Brooklyn, NY
conferences/workshops research
2013 NAMP Conference
National Arts Marketing Project
Portland, OR
Date: 2013-11-08
Valuing the Art of Industrial Design
National Endowment for the Arts


artsplate.org
forward this unsubscribe contact us
Do you know someone who might be interested in receiving this weekly newsletter?
You're receiving this newsletter because you subscribed.
California Arts Council
1300 I Street
Suite 930
Sacramento, CA 95814
916.322.6555

www.cac.ca.gov
editor@cac.ca.gov

Monday

Atherton Arts Foundation and Silicon Valley Open Studios



The Exhibit at the
Jennings Pavilion
Dear Kenney,
Join 26 outstanding artists at The Exhibit at the Jenning Pavilion at Holbrook-Palmer Park at 150 Watkins Avenue in Atherton on September 6 and 7..
The Exhibit at the Jennings Pavilion

The Atherton Arts Foundation and Silicon Valley Open Studios have invited some of he most brilliant and accomplished artists from the Town of Atherton and Silicon Valley to display and sell their work at this intimate, juried exhibit.
Painters, sculptures, watercolorists, and photographers, along with others will display and sell their latest (and finest) work. Here's your chance to get something to help add color to the dorm room of a college bound student, or something to brighten your home. You can meet each artists personally and view or purchase some outstanding artwork. Or meet some new artists that you've never seen before.
 
Dates and Time
Friday September 6, from 5 pm until 8 pm
Saturday September 7, from 11 am to 4 pm
Admission is Free  

Join us on Friday evening for a reception and a chance to meet each artist and discuss their work. Enjoy the refreshments and cast your ballot for the "People's Choice Award". Visit both the main exhibit in the Jennings Pavilion as well as the Highlight Gallery Exhibit in adjacent Palmer House
.
 
Location

The location for the exhibit is Holbrook-Palmer Park, 150 Watkins Avenue, Atherton. Get the map here.

 
 
  



 
About Us
This event is sponsored by The Atherton Arts Foundation, The Town of Atherton, and Silicon Valley Open Studios.
You can see more information about these organizations at the following links:
www.svos.org
www.athertonartsfoundation.org

Thursday

John Singer Sargent and the Influence of Madame X


Les Beehive - Nicole Kidman recreates John Singer Sargent paintings for Vogue by Steven Meisel, June 1999

Stephanie Goldman / American Woman / 84" x 50"
nil


 Julianne Moore Harper’s Bazaar May 2008 by Peter Lindbergh Madame X

Vincent Desiderio's painting that to me is his version of Sargent's Madame X 

Wednesday

The Theme of Boys Blowing Bubbles

Recently I took a trip to Seattle and saw this painting.

attribution.jpg

It got me thinking about the genre and what a painting of a boy blowing bubbles.  I was first introduced to the theme through Chardin.
 I just thought it was fun that the theme comes up so much and what it seems to symbolize is that youth is fleeting and disappears as quickly as a soap bubble  bursts.  Here's more examples'

Artist:
Completion Date: 1869
Place of Creation: Paris, France
Style: Realism
Technique: oil
Material: canvas
Dimensions: 100.5 x 81.4 cm
Gallery: Museu Calouste Gulbenkian, Lisbon, Portugal 



Hans Heyerdahl - Boy blowing bubbles (1882)


Hans Heyerdahl - Boy blowing bubbles (1882)
 
Boy blowing bubbles By Frans van Mieris  
Netherlands Baroque artist born 1635 - died 1681 
 
attribution.jpg
Michaelina Woutiers
Flemish, ca. 1620-after 1682
Boys Blowing Bubbles, 1640s
Oil on canvas
35 5/8 x 47 3/4 in.
Seattle Art Museum, Gift of Mr. Floyd Naramore
But for years, the painting of the boys was attributed to Jacob van Oost, a 17th-century painter from Bruges. Van Oost has become a bit of a cipher. There is only one signed painting by van Oost, said SAM curator Chiyo Ishikawa (here), but there are many attributed to him. “There hasn’t been a monographic exhibition of all the paintings attributed to him, but if there were, you would be very confused,” Ishikawa said. “The one documented work we know by him looks nothing like our painting. We also had another painting attributed to him [of dogs and a hunt] that looks nothing like this painting. (We deaccessioned that one in 1996 because [it was in bad condition]).”
Ishikawa and others long suspected that Boys Blowing Bubbles was not a van Oost. But whose was it?
In 2002, a scholar of Flemish painting named Katlijne Van der Stighelen happened to be in Seattle, and she came across the painting at SAM. She already had an idea whose she thought it was: Michaelina Woutiers, a female court painter in Vienna—an anomaly. But it wasn’t until Van der Stighelen published a paper in 2005 after a symposium on Flemish patronage between 1550 and 1700 that another 17th-century Flemish scholar, Peter Sutton, suggested to Ishikawa that this painting might be by this unusual female painter. Van der Stighelen concurs.
At this point, the attribution is still the best possible guess rather than an ironclad fact. Like the Goya decision, it’s based on stylistic similarities to four known court paintings by Woutiers, which are held at the Vienna Kunsthistorisches Museum. Unfortunately, the museum’s web site doesn’t include any images by Woutiers, but Ishikawa says there’s one in particular, a portrait of Bacchus, that includes a little boy on the right hand side of the picture that looks a lot like the boy on the right in the SAM painting. “I felt confident enough based on comparative photographs and these two opinions to go ahead and make the change,” Ishikawa said. “The Jacob van Oost [attribution] was always problematic, and this person does seem to be a distinct artistic personality. But really, to be completely satisfied, you’d want to get the paintings together.”
In the late 1960s and early 1970s, with the advent of the Rembrandt Research Project—which in the early stages relied heavily on scientific technology in a search for the “true” Rembrandts—science was held out to be the key to solving attribution mysteries once and for all. But traditional connoisseurship turns out to have as great a role as science. Science may be able to tell you how old something is, or precisely what it’s made of, but consider that Rembrandt, just to take one example, ran a large studio of artists he hired to create paintings that look just like Rembrandts, and you start to glimpse the complications.
In Seattle, with the museum’s relatively limited resources and great distance from the European collections, there have been plenty of question marks. In 2004, Ishikawa said, because of new scholarship, SAM changed the attribution on a 14th-century saint portrait by Allegretto Nuzi to Puccio di Simone. Sometimes, an attribution is little more solid than a bubble in thin air.



Here's a video on Chardin if you wanna learn more.


Sunday

The Frye Museum in Seattle


Over my break I visited a lot of museums. Some of the things that I noticed in particular were how museums are curated.   I wanted to share some pictures of this one in particular. The Frye Art Museum in Seattle has a core collection of nineteenth-century landscapes; originally a collection that showed landscapes from the Seattle area and also transcendental landscapes it now shows some contemporary stuff but I still found the original collection of landscapes to be the most compelling, beautiful and interesting.

I thought the most recent installation was creative because it lined a series of beautiful landscapes along a single unified horizon line. What was neat was it was punctuated by the 19th century frames and different painting styles. Even the subject matter of the paintings were varied from summer seascapes to streams and farm scenes. I just thought it was kind of neat.