Pablo Picasso was an artist who changed a lot over his lifetime, and he's usually a big part of art history classes. To keep it simple, let’s just hit some key points.
If you compare Picasso’s early work to Paul Cézanne’s
paintings, you can see how Picasso’s style started to shift. Cézanne had this
way of breaking down objects into basic shapes, which influenced later artists.
He didn’t use straight realism—he sort of broke things into parts that looked
more abstract. This way of simplifying forms had a big effect on how Picasso
thought about art.
Many people think Cézanne’s experiments helped open the door
for Cubism, which Picasso later helped develop. Cubism uses flat shapes and
different angles to show an object all at once. One example of this is Guernica,
a painting Picasso made in 1937. It’s large—over 11 feet tall and more than 25
feet wide—and painted in gray, black, and white. It shows people, animals, and
buildings in the middle of chaos, based on the bombing of the town of Guernica
during the Spanish Civil War. The painting doesn’t follow traditional
perspective. Instead, it uses overlapping and broken shapes, which are typical
in Cubist work.
Before this, Picasso had already shown a lot of skill at a young age. When he was a teenager, he made drawings and paintings that showed he had a solid understanding of anatomy, shading, and proportion. His early pieces looked more traditional and realistic. Later, he started trying new things—using bolder lines, changing proportions, and playing with different ways of seeing the same object.
Picasso painted Science and Charity in 1897 when he
was around 15 or 16 years old. It’s an oil painting on canvas, and it's now in
the Museo Picasso in Barcelona. At the time he made it, Picasso had already
developed strong technical skills. The painting shows careful attention to
anatomy, shading, and composition, which are usually taught much later in an
artist's training.
The scene in the painting shows a woman lying in bed. On one
side of her is a doctor taking her pulse and recording something. On the other
side, there’s a nun holding a child. The
Picasso’s father, José Ruiz Blasco, was an art teacher who
taught him to draw and paint. Picasso started learning formal art techniques
from a young age. He spent time at the Escola de Belles Arts in
Barcelona, where his father also taught. By the time he was a teenager, he had
already learned the traditional academic approach to painting, including how to
build a composition and how to use light and shadow.
This painting was made during a period when young artists
were expected to copy classical models and master academic painting
before experimenting with new styles. Science and Charity was exhibited
in local art shows in Spain and received awards. The people in the painting
were modeled from real life—Picasso used his father as the doctor figure.
The painting’s style follows the realist tradition.
The figures are shown with lifelike detail, and the setting includes
recognizable objects like the iron bed frame and the glass bottle, which help
place the scene in a hospital or home care environment from the late 1800s.
There are no symbolic objects beyond the figures themselves and their
positions. The nun and the child were often used in art of this time to suggest
care or religious support, but Picasso doesn’t include any supernatural
imagery.
Picasso's version of the absinthe drinker shows he’s
working with the same idea, but using a very different style. Instead of
repeating Manet’s approach, Picasso uses what would have been considered a
non-traditional or modern visual language at the time. While Manet’s work
focused more on realism and used careful shading and proportion, Picasso
distorts the figure. He uses flat shapes, strong outlines, and highly saturated
colors that aren’t naturalistic. These choices are similar to what artists like
Paul Gauguin and Vincent van Gogh were doing in the late 1800s—Gauguin, for
instance, often used flat color fields and heavy outlines, and Van Gogh used
thick, energetic brushwork and intense colors.
In this painting, Picasso uses a female figure instead of a
male one, and the composition is more stylized. The figure is drawn in a way
that ignores strict anatomical accuracy, with simplified shapes and exaggerated
features. This kind of distortion hadn’t really appeared in European art
before, at least not in a deliberate and structured way. There’s also influence
from ukiyo-e, a kind of Japanese printmaking that became widely
collected in Europe in the late 1800s. These prints often used flattened space
and bold outlines, and they helped European artists rethink how to compose an
image.
By the early 1900s, photography had made it easier to
capture realistic images, so painters were no longer expected to just copy the
world as it looked. This gave artists like Picasso more room to explore
personal or symbolic uses of color and form. His use of distortion wasn’t
accidental—it was a conscious decision to break from earlier rules and
experiment with how figures could be represented. The choice to make the figure
look simplified or childlike doesn’t mean it was unskilled; Picasso had already
shown he could paint with realism earlier in his life. Instead, this approach
reflects a shift in what painting could be used for.
Come and study with me, videos, etexts, and study guides,
https://www.udemy.com/user/kenneymencher/
No comments:
Post a Comment