19th C Romanticism, Walpole

 

The Romantic movement in art and literature was known for its focus on emotion, imagination, and individual experience. Unlike earlier styles that valued order and reason, Romantic artists and writers explored intense feelings, dramatic events, and the darker sides of human nature. They often looked to history, nature, and personal suffering as inspiration. Artists like Horace Walpole created fantasy-like Gothic settings, while others like J.M.W. Turner used light and color to express emotion and moral themes. Painters like Théodore Géricault and Francisco Goya showed real-life tragedies and human cruelty to make people think about justice, suffering, and the flaws in society. Romanticism was about more than beauty—it was about telling powerful stories through emotion, symbolism, and dramatic style.

In the 18th and 19th centuries, figures like Horace Walpole and John Ruskin helped shape how people thought about the Gothic past, though in very different ways. Walpole used Gothic style to create imaginative, theatrical settings like his home, Strawberry Hill, while Ruskin believed that true Gothic architecture held deep moral and spiritual meaning. Around the same time, painter J.M.W. Turner captured intense emotional experiences through light, color, and atmosphere, especially in works like The Slave Ship, which dealt with human cruelty and natural forces. Together, these artists and thinkers reflect the Romantic era’s fascination with history, fantasy, morality, and the emotional power of beauty.

Horace Walpole was an English writer who lived in the 18th century, and he’s known for writing The Castle of Otranto, one of the first novels we now call “Gothic.” He also designed a house called Strawberry Hill, which he remodeled to look like a Gothic castle, even though it wasn’t built in the Gothic period. Instead of being a real medieval structure, it was more like a fantasy version of one—something that fit with his imagination more than with actual history.

Walpole’s redesign of Strawberry Hill included architectural features that looked Gothic, like pointed arches and vaulted ceilings, but they didn’t actually serve the same structural purposes. In real Gothic buildings from the 12th and 13th centuries, those features—like pointed arches, ribbed vaults, and flying buttresses—were part of the building’s support system. At Strawberry Hill, they were just decoration. The house wasn’t built using the same techniques or materials as true Gothic cathedrals. It was more like a theatrical set, made to look Gothic from the outside, like icing decorations on a wedding cake.

The inside of Strawberry Hill followed the same idea. The ceilings and walls were filled with decorative, lightweight plaster details that weren’t functional. These were more like set pieces than parts of a real, load-bearing structure. Walpole was creating a fantasy environment where he could feel like he was living in the world of his own novel, complete with eerie monks and rattling chains.

During the 18th and 19th centuries, it became common for wealthy people in England to create artificial ruins and follies—fake castles, temples, and broken columns—in their gardens. These were meant to feel romantic or mysterious, even though they weren’t old or real. Strawberry Hill fit into that trend.

Later on, in the 19th century, a writer and thinker named John Ruskin became one of the major voices in the Gothic Revival movement. Ruskin was an aesthetician, someone who studied and wrote about art and beauty. He believed Gothic architecture had moral and spiritual value because it united decoration with structure—meaning that the beauty of the buildings came from their honest use of materials and engineering. He thought that medieval builders were more sincere and more religious, and he saw that time as more pure or noble.

Ruskin wanted modern architecture to return to that style, not just in appearance but in its values. He thought the elaborate details of Gothic churches weren’t just pretty—they also helped the building stand up. He also made some guesses that weren’t based on facts. For example, he claimed that Gothic arches came from the shapes of trees in a forest, with branches arching overhead like a canopy. But that’s not true. Gothic builders figured out their designs through a lot of experiments and changes over time, not by copying tree shapes. It just happens to look similar.

Walpole and Ruskin were connected in a loose way: one created a fantasy version of the Gothic past, and the other believed in bringing back what he thought was the true spirit of the Gothic period. Even though they had different reasons, both helped shape how later generations thought about medieval architecture.

Come and study with me, videos, etexts, and study guides,
https://www.udemy.com/user/kenneymencher/