Showing posts with label homoerotic art. Show all posts
Showing posts with label homoerotic art. Show all posts
Tuesday
Saturday
Wednesday
Sunday
Saturday
Friday
Thursday
Saturday
Thursday
Wednesday

Rough Guy with a Cigar, oil on canvas panel 11x14 inches by Kenney Mencher
$189.99
$189.99
FREE SHIPPING
I PAY THE SALES TAX
I PAY THE SALES TAX
One of the things that I'm really trying to master is anatomy and gesture. When I was an art student I was taught that content or subject matter was more important than formal elements such as color or anatomy. In the last 10 years I've realized that even though my content, homoerotic images of men and women, is valid I felt like I could do more to master the basic construction of the human body.
Some of the things that I was thinking about when working on this painting were specifically the hands and how to draw hands and make them masculine and blocky. The model leash your muscle and people that I've known who were that muscular have very strong looking's been one of the ways that I wanted to exaggerate or increase the look of this was to build up the paint along bony landmarks like the knuckles and where the light built up along the ridge where the bone leads to the thumb. So part of this is the variation of textures well from thin in the darker areas to thicker where light is hitting.
This is a standard size and will easily fit in an inexpensive frame which can be bought at photo shops, stationary stores, and art supply stores. You could probably find a cool vintage frame here on Etsy.
To learn more about me and my art visit
www.kenney-mencher.com
www.kenney-mencher.com
Friday
Sitting in the Window on a Spring Day with His Shirt Off, watercolor on cotton paper 11x14 inches by Kenney Mencher
Auction on Ebay starting at $20Sitting in the Window on a Spring Day with His Shirt Off, watercolor on cotton paper 11x14 inches by Kenney Mencher
http://www.ebay.com/itm/-/272403013664?
Saturday
There's something heroic about leather daddies.
There's something heroic about leather daddies. Even when I was a little kid and I'd really didn't understand sexuality I was drawn to men who looked like bikers and had that rough and gruff appearance with facial hair chewing on a cigar. My favorite comic book character was the Wolverine. In earlier versions of the comic book he wasn't the Hugh Jackman version but rather a small stout hairy little tough guy who looked like he could do some real damage. I like the fact that he smoked and especially his hairy forearms. I guess that explains part of why I draw and paint so many leather daddies.
To learn more about me please visit my website at:
http://www.kenney-mencher.com/
To learn more about me please visit my website at:
http://www.kenney-mencher.com/
Friday
F. Holland Day (Gay Artist?)
![]() |
| Youth Sitting on a Stone, by F. Holland Day (1907) |
What in the world makes someone a gay artist? I'm talking about does the art make them gay or the fact that they are gay make them a gay artist? Can a man be straight but a gay artist?
One of the ideas that I’ve been grappling with my own work
is the idea that there is no clear definition of what makes something “gay.”
For example, there’s an idea for art historians put forward by an article by an
author by the name of Roland Barthes, that I had to read in graduate school,
called “Death of the Author.” The theory basically is that whenever an image or
work of art is seen by someone other than the artist the meaning changes for
that work of art because of who that person is who’s viewing it.
There’s an artist is a little bit of an enigma, named F.
Holland Day. He worked in the beginning of the 20th century at a
time when homosexuality was suspect but it was still a big part of high
culture. Again, as in other artists, it’s kind of the don’t ask don’t tell
policy. I did some research on this artist and I’m not completely convinced he
was a so-called “gay” man. It almost seems to me from the what little I’ve read
that he might’ve actually been a sexual or at least completely repressed in
terms of his sexuality.
![]() |
| Tommaso Dei Cavalieriby Michelangelo |
This is interesting because I think the same thing is
true about Michelangelo and there are documents that support that Michelangelo
was attracted to men but never actually acted on it. I base this on some
letters that he wrote to a young man named Tommaso Cavalieri.
So looking at F Holland Day’s photographs the images in them
are very romantic portrayals of young beautiful man. He also has a couple of
gnarly looking Jesus portraits but all of them have for me a strong erotic
content based on looking at the human body, especially the male body. Today
most of his models would be labeled “twinks.” However the symbolism of his work
is based in some sort of Greco-Roman 19th to early 20th
century ideal of what male beauty is.
Doing an Internet search for his work it’s interesting to
note that some of his photographs have a sort of 19th century
ethnographic quality to them. In some ways his photographs are very similar to
the paintings of the Orientalists such as Gerome, Delacroix, and Ingres. He had
some portraits in which he’s dressed up as an Arab and he has some
self portraits as Jesus. The temptation for art historians is to read an
awful lot into this.
He also has imagery depicting women, however, none of the
imagery concerning women or depicting women seems to have the same erotic
charge that his portraits of young men have.
He does even have one portrait of a Marine that in my head I
immediately thought of “The Village People,” is sort of gay stereotype of the
sailor. And this Marine is pretty hot and has some good hair.
![]() |
| A Marine 1912 Fred Holland Day |
So in conclusion, I think it’s possible to classify his work
as having homoerotic tones to it but I’m not sure if you would actually call
him a gay artist. I don’t think that that label would’ve even existed at that
point in time, obviously. In the same way that in the Renaissance there were many
artists who expounded on and supported the idea of male to male love and
relationships based in a Greek historical context. However, they just didn’t
think about it as either being gay or straight at that point in time. Maybe it
was just too closeted but I also suspect that there was a tolerance for
homoerotic imagery in Renaissance art and in the 19th century as
long as one didn’t get all Oscar Wilde about it.
Saturday
NSFW Drawings and Paintings of Hot Men
Labels:
bear,
bears,
gay,
gay art,
gay bears,
gay men,
homoerotic,
homoerotic art
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





















































