Vincent van Gogh grew up in a strict religious household in the Netherlands. His father was a minister in the Dutch Reformed Church, and their family held strong Calvinist beliefs. Even though their life was modest, van Gogh had some early exposure to upper middle-class culture because his uncle and cousin were both art dealers. This connection eventually led him into the art world.
As a young adult, he worked for an art dealership with branches in The Hague, London, and Paris. While in London, he lived in a boarding house and became emotionally attached to the daughter of the landlady. His behavior in that situation was described as obsessive, and it seems he had trouble forming healthy social relationships. Some of this comes through in his letters, and the novel Lust for Life by Irving Stone, which fictionalizes his life, really emphasizes this. That book, published in the 1930s, shaped how a lot of people saw van Gogh, especially after the film version came out.
He eventually lost his job and tried several other paths, including working at a school and training to become a preacher. He studied briefly to become a minister and went to the Borinage, a coal-mining region in Belgium, to work as a missionary. He lived in very poor conditions there and gave away most of his belongings to the miners. He wrote that this period was deeply difficult for him, both physically and mentally. His health got worse, and his brother Theo helped bring him back from a breakdown.
At some point, he decided to dedicate himself to art. Theo supported him financially so he could study and work full time. During this period, he fell in love with his widowed cousin, Kee Vos, and proposed to her even after she had rejected him. Letters suggest he didn’t take the rejection well, and his behavior upset her family. There were other instances where he struggled with social norms and boundaries.
He went to The Hague to work more seriously as an artist and connected with his cousin Anton Mauve, a well-known painter at the time. Mauve helped him by giving him materials and teaching him some basics, like how to work with plaster casts. But van Gogh’s behavior—along with his living arrangement with a woman named Sien, who had worked as a prostitute—caused tension. They lived together for a while, and she modeled for some of his early works. Eventually, he had to leave The Hague because of financial problems and social pressure.
After leaving The Hague, he returned to the Netherlands and focused on painting working-class people and rural scenes. These paintings were done in dark, earth-tone colors and show the influence of artists like Rembrandt. But van Gogh didn’t have strong academic training in figure drawing or color theory at this point, so some of these works—like The Potato Eaters—look rough or uneven. Still, art historians consider this an important early phase in his career.
Later, he moved to Paris and got involved with a group of younger artists who were experimenting with color and technique. He met painters like Paul Gauguin, Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec, Émile Bernard, Camille Pissarro, and John Russell. There’s a chance he saw paintings by Claude Monet and Edgar Degas, though there’s no strong evidence he met them in person. Van Gogh didn’t always fit in socially, even in this more open crowd. He visited cafés and bars but was often on the margins. Some of these scenes are dramatized in the film version of Lust for Life, which turns certain aspects of his life into more theatrical versions of events.
After going to Paris and seeing the work of Georges Seurat and Claude Monet, van Gogh had a major shift in how he approached painting. These artists, especially Seurat with his pointillism and Monet with his use of light and color, really changed how van Gogh thought about technique. This period marked a turning point for him. He left the more traditional art world behind and moved to Arles in the south of France. There, with fewer people watching or judging him, he worked constantly. He was extremely self-critical and pushed himself harder than anyone else could.
He painted a lot of self-portraits, similar to what Rembrandt had done earlier. These weren’t just studies of his appearance—they showed how he was feeling at different moments in his life. He also kept experimenting with color and texture, borrowing ideas from Seurat and Monet. There may have been some influence from Édouard Manet too, but van Gogh’s style doesn’t really connect directly with Paul Cézanne, even though they were working at the same time.
Van Gogh couldn’t handle life in Paris for long, so he and his brother Theo arranged for him to live in Arles. There, he rented a place known as the Yellow House. Paul Gauguin came to stay with him, and during that time van Gogh created an entire series of sunflower paintings to decorate a room for his guest. He painted obsessively—sometimes making two or three paintings in a single day, along with several sketches. This nonstop work helped him improve his technique. Even though some of the drawings were awkward, and his figures were sometimes off, he had a strong natural sense for color and composition.
Author Malcolm Gladwell has talked about the idea that you need around 10,000 hours of practice to become really skilled at something. He gives examples like Bill Gates and Steve Jobs. Van Gogh might not have heard of that rule, but he painted so much that he did develop a solid understanding of how to use color and structure. His improvement came not from formal training but from constant practice.
Eventually, things got tense between van Gogh and Gauguin. They argued a lot, and after one fight, van Gogh was found in bed with a serious injury to his ear. Police reports show he was bleeding heavily. Gauguin denied knowing what had happened and left town. There’s a theory that Gauguin, who had fencing experience, might have injured van Gogh with a sword during their fight. Other accounts say van Gogh may have cut his own ear and gave it to a woman at a nearby brothel. The details are unclear, but this event marked the beginning of a serious breakdown.
After that, van Gogh was taken to a hospital, and later, he admitted himself to an asylum in Saint-Rémy-de-Provence. He had repeated episodes that might have been psychotic breaks. Some people today suggest he may have had schizophrenia or another serious mental illness, but that’s still debated. What’s clear is that while he was in the asylum, he continued to paint, and some of his best-known works come from that period. He seemed to find some stability in painting again and also began thinking more seriously about religion. While living in Saint-Rémy, he also received care from a local doctor who supported his recovery.
Dr. Paul Gachet was the physician who looked after van Gogh during the final months of his life. He lived in Auvers-sur-Oise, a small town north of Paris, and had an interest in both medicine and art. He was considered a bit of a dilettante—someone with a casual but enthusiastic interest in the arts. He painted, collected artwork, and was known to support artists who were struggling with depression or creative blocks.
Gachet treated van Gogh with homeopathic remedies, which were common at the time. In one of van Gogh’s portraits of Dr. Gachet, he’s shown seated beside a plant that botanists have identified as Digitalis (foxglove), which was used historically as a heart medicine but could also affect mood. Some researchers think van Gogh may have been taking it as part of his treatment. Others believe the plant in the painting might be Eryngium, another herb sometimes used in folk medicine.
Dr. Gachet encouraged van Gogh to keep painting, believing that creative work would help him recover. Van Gogh took this advice seriously and produced more than 70 paintings in about 70 days. This period was highly productive, but it may also have pushed him too far. He was likely still dealing with mental health problems, and some biographies describe this as a time when he was showing signs of agitation or instability.
One of the last paintings van Gogh completed is often called Wheatfield with Crows. Some writers have connected the imagery in that painting—specifically the dark crows and stormy sky—with death. They point to letters he wrote around that time that suggest he was deeply unhappy. But there's still disagreement about how he died.
The standard story is that van Gogh shot himself in the stomach while in a wheat field, then walked back to the inn where he was staying and died two days later. However, some historians believe he may not have taken his own life. A theory supported by more recent research says he may have been accidentally shot by two boys playing with a gun, and chose not to blame them.
Van Gogh’s death happened in July 1890. Just six months later, his younger brother Theo also died, likely from complications related to syphilis. Theo had always been closely tied to Vincent, emotionally and financially. Some people think that after Vincent’s death, Theo’s health got worse quickly, possibly due to grief or the stress of losing his brother.
The story of Vincent van Gogh is often told as a story of misunderstood genius, but the facts show a much more complicated and human life. He worked constantly, struggled with illness, and had a close but difficult relationship with his family. While people often focus on his talent or the tragedy of his death, his life also shows the challenges faced by artists trying to find their way outside of mainstream systems.
In this part, let’s take a closer look at one of Vincent van Gogh’s most well-known paintings, Starry Night. You’ve probably seen it on posters or book covers, and there's even a song about it by Don McLean. It’s one of those works that became widely recognized, partly because it reproduces so well. The colors are bold and the lines are really clear, which made it ideal for printing in books and posters, especially during the 1930s and 1940s. That might be one reason why it gained popularity after his death.
Van Gogh didn’t sell many paintings during his life—maybe one or two—and when he died, he left behind a huge number of finished works. That gave people a complete picture of what he had done, which helped build his reputation later on.
When you look at Starry Night, the first thing you notice is how heavy and textured the paint is. The surface has a lot of build-up—what’s called impasto—where the paint is so thick it stands up from the canvas. In reproductions, that’s hard to see, but it’s a big part of the original painting. The sky is full of swirling lines and dashes that work together in a way similar to optical mixing. That’s a technique where small bits of color are placed next to each other so your eye blends them. Georges Seurat used this in pointillism, and you can also see it in the pastel work of Edgar Degas.
The swirling lines in the sky curve and loop around, and they make the sky feel full of movement. You can see the same kind of curved lines repeated in other parts of the painting—the tall cypress tree on the left rises up in flame-like shapes, and the rolling hills in the background also echo these curves. That creates a kind of visual rhythm across the painting.
The town at the bottom, with its small buildings and church steeple, is made of simple, blocky shapes. Van Gogh outlines a lot of the forms, which gives them a sort of diagrammatic or even cartoon-like look. He used very saturated colors—often straight from the tube—without blending or shading them in the traditional sense. He didn’t focus on chiaroscuro, which is the way painters often show light and shadow to create depth. Instead, he was focused on how color itself could carry emotion or meaning.
Unlike Claude Monet or Edgar Degas, who were trying to capture how light looked in a specific moment, van Gogh wasn’t trying to record what he saw directly. He was interpreting what he saw and building a picture from memory, imagination, and personal meaning.
Some interpretations of Starry Night are based on ideas from van Gogh’s letters and background. He was deeply interested in religion and had studied theology earlier in his life. Some people see connections between this painting and a concept from Saint Augustine’s writings. Augustine described two cities: the City of God, which is eternal and spiritual, and the City of Man, which is temporary and earthly.
In Starry Night, the town and church are small and set low in the painting. If you were reading it through that lens, they could represent the City of Man. The swirling sky above—huge, luminous, and full of energy—might be a symbol of the greater spiritual world, or what Augustine would call the City of God. The tall cypress tree, often used in cemeteries as a grave marker, could also be read as a symbol of death or a link between earth and sky. That’s not clearly proven, but it’s a possible interpretation based on religious and cultural traditions van Gogh would have known.
The mountains in the background stretch out beyond the town,
giving the landscape a feeling of endless space. This echoes earlier Romantic
ideas about nature, like those seen in the work of Caspar David Friedrich,
where natural scenes were used to express spiritual themes. Whether van Gogh
intended all of this or not, we do know from his letters that he thought deeply
about both religion and nature, and he saw painting as a way to explore both.
Let’s take a closer look at one of Vincent van Gogh’s self-portraits. It’s worth examining not just for what it shows about him, but for how he handled the painting formally—things like paint texture, color, line, and technique. In this portrait, the paint is applied very thickly. If you look at the background, you’ll notice it has a swirling wave-like pattern that’s similar to the sky in Starry Night. But when you move in closer to the face, the marks change. They become shorter, tighter, almost like dashes—somewhat similar to the pastel strokes used by Edgar Degas or Mary Cassatt when they were modeling light and shadow on faces.
Van Gogh handles different parts of the painting using different types of marks. The face has one texture, the hair another, and the background moves in smooth, curving waves. The clothing is laid out using quick contour lines that follow the shape of the arms. These lines wrap around the figure in a way artists refer to as cross-contouring, where you use directional marks to suggest volume. Altogether, the painting shows a mix of techniques. It also captures van Gogh’s likeness accurately—something that’s not always discussed, but worth noting.
When you compare this to an earlier work like The Potato Eaters, there’s a big difference in skill. In those earlier paintings, the drawing is clumsy, and the color isn’t well handled. People often try to find early signs of his later style in them, but it’s clear he was still learning at that point. The figures are blocky and awkward, and the tones are muddy. He hadn’t yet figured out how to control color, especially muted or low-key tones. You can see the effort, but it doesn’t yet show the confident handling of his later paintings.
Another interesting painting to talk about is Bedroom in Arles. At first glance, the perspective looks a little off—as if the room is tilting or skewed. But that effect isn’t necessarily a mistake. Van Gogh painted several versions of this room, and one is on display in New York. When you get very close to it—about as close as he would have been while painting—you can see how some of the odd angles come from the way we naturally see space when we’re right up against something. Also, the actual room wasn’t a perfect rectangle. One of the corners jutted out at an odd angle, so part of what looks like distortion is just what was really there.
The outlines around the furniture and objects are thick and solid. That makes the forms stand out clearly, almost like a poster or a cartoon. He also followed the direction of objects with his brushstrokes—for example, vertical strokes on the bedposts and curved strokes along the floorboards. These choices add structure and texture.
The color relationships are also worth mentioning. Van Gogh often used bright, saturated colors, and he liked to pair warm and cool tones to create contrast. In this painting, the bed is orange and the walls are blue. That blue-orange contrast helps the bed stand out and gives the scene depth.
While it’s tempting to interpret the painting emotionally, we know this was a personal space for van Gogh. He arranged it carefully and painted it more than once, which suggests it was meaningful to him. The room was small and orderly, and it might have felt like a controlled environment during a period when much of his life wasn’t. That reading isn’t directly confirmed in the letters, but the attention he gave to this subject makes it likely that it mattered to him.
No comments:
Post a Comment