William Hogarth

 

Scholars focus on William Hogarth—not as a painter, but as a printmaker. While Hogarth did paint, he’s better known for his prints. That’s partly because printmaking was more profitable for him. He worked in England during the 1700s and wasn’t really connected with the aristocracy. Instead, he had closer ties to people involved in theater and the performing arts. His connections with the theater world influenced his art, especially his attention to character and narrative. If you check out his biography, you’ll notice how deeply involved he was with that part of English society.

As a painter, Hogarth wasn’t known for refined portraiture, which was the genre that brought the most fame and money in England during that time. His style leaned more toward caricature, and he preferred painting genre scenes—pictures of everyday life. Because of this, he didn’t fit in neatly with movements like rococo, which was more popular in France. While he was active during the baroque and rococo periods, his work doesn’t follow the typical themes of either. He often made fun of French tastes and aesthetics, and some of his prints include visual jokes at their expense.

Art historians often have a hard time placing Hogarth into one style category. His work doesn’t follow established trends, which makes him stand out. In some ways, he’s more like Albrecht Dürer, a German printmaker from the 1500s who also produced detailed prints with strong moralizing messages and tried to reach wider audiences by selling prints instead of relying on commissions.

Two of Hogarth’s well-known prints, Beer Street and Gin Lane, were created as a pair. These are called a diptych—just two works meant to be seen together. They were made around the mid-1700s during a time when England was dealing with a real public health problem linked to cheap gin. New methods for fast, low-cost distillation had made gin widely available, and overuse led to social problems, especially in poor urban neighborhoods. Gin became a kind of early drug crisis, similar to how people now talk about epidemics related to drugs like crack cocaine.

Some of Hogarth’s friends encouraged him to make prints about this, hoping the visuals would raise awareness about the issue. Beer Street shows a positive scene. People in the image are healthy, well-fed, and seem to be doing well economically. They’re holding mugs of beer, and the overall mood is calm and stable. There’s a sign painter in the image who’s smiling as he paints a sign showing people dancing on a pile of barley—a plant used to brew beer. That barley pile connects beer to agriculture and honest work. The buildings are in good shape, and everyone seems to have a purpose.

But when you move your eye across the picture, you’ll spot something that shows the contrast: a pawnbroker shop. That detail suggests not everyone is doing great and sets up the contrast with the second image, Gin Lane, which shows the effects of gin addiction and social breakdown. These two prints together show Hogarth’s way of telling visual stories with humor, puns, and strong moral points built into the details.

In Beer Street and Gin Lane, William Hogarth uses side-by-side prints to compare two different versions of urban life in mid-1700s England. These prints were sold as a set and meant to be hung together. They were part of a campaign to raise awareness about the rise in gin consumption and the effects it had on poor communities. Beer, at that time, was seen as safer and healthier than water in many areas of England. Light beer or small ale often had only 1–2% alcohol and was used as a way to purify water. It was also calorie-rich, which helped people stay nourished. Gin, on the other hand, was a stronger distilled liquor that caused quicker addiction and more harmful effects.

In Beer Street, Hogarth shows a clean and active neighborhood. People appear healthy and content. On the rooftops, workers are reroofing buildings while drinking beer. Barrels are being lowered from windows. Everyone seems busy but relaxed. A boy hands a flagon of beer to a man standing below, adding to the image of social connection. One sign painter is painting a pub sign showing people dancing on a pile of barley—a crop used in beer-making. He’s smiling while he works. The buildings are in good repair, and the streets are filled with movement. In one part of the scene, you can spot a pawnbroker shop labeled “Pinch.” The building looks run-down and unstable. This plays on the idea that pawnbrokers were seen as preying on poor people, especially in times of hardship. The name “Pinch” is also a pun, suggesting financial pressure and discomfort.

There’s more wordplay in the scene, too. A woman on the left holds a key, which may connect to themes of virtue and trust. A cheerful fishmonger stands nearby. Books are visible in the bottom corner, possibly referencing literacy or education. Hogarth often included literary references and puns in his work.

In contrast, Gin Lane shows a neighborhood in collapse. On the left side, the pawnbroker shop is clean and well-kept, suggesting that business is thriving—but for the wrong reasons. The shop is labeled “S. Gripe,” another pun about exploitation. Around the shop, things are falling apart. Buildings are crumbling, and a man is seen hanging from a beam. Dead bodies are being carried in coffins. On the right, the “Kilman Distillery” pumps out gin. Below it, a small child is being fed gin directly from a bottle, and a group of people are drinking heavily.

In the lower left, children fight over a bare bone with a dog. There’s no sign of food production or farming—just desperation. A woman sits on stairs so drunk that her baby slips from her arms and falls into the street. In the lower right, a man lies on the ground, skeletal and weak. A block of text next to him reads, The Downfall of Mrs. Gin. This is a reference to the idea that gin destroys households. The skeletal man is sometimes interpreted as “Mr. Gin,” showing the final stage of addiction.

Hogarth’s prints were created to warn people about the dangers of gin. The contrast between the two scenes was meant to deliver a moral message in a visual format. His work was widely circulated, and it played a role in public campaigns that led to the Gin Act of 1751 (not 1738 or 1748), which limited gin sales and tried to reduce alcohol abuse in cities.

Come and study with me, videos, e-texts, and study guides,
https://www.udemy.com/user/kenneymencher/